(no subject)
Jun. 10th, 2005 06:53 pmI was just reading through Boxes at my site as
digital_diva pointed out typos at the same time. The problem is there shouldn't be any. I had it beta read by a few different people which suggests it's me who screwed up. My question is, how do you use a beta reading? For example, I read from the beta read file and change it on my original one. Obviously that's not fool proof or there wouldn't be any typos at all. So how do you do it? Learn me so I don't make embarrassing mistakes again.
Also, do you ever read something and know it could be more? I still love Boxes but think it could be better. It could be made richer I guess. So does anyone want to teach me how to work on a really long story and stop being so impatient? It's what I want to do next, write something long and detailed. Spin out a story that captures the interest and keeps it.
So yeah, I know I can't really be taught patience, that has to come on its own but I'd love to know about how you approach beta reading.
Also, do you ever read something and know it could be more? I still love Boxes but think it could be better. It could be made richer I guess. So does anyone want to teach me how to work on a really long story and stop being so impatient? It's what I want to do next, write something long and detailed. Spin out a story that captures the interest and keeps it.
So yeah, I know I can't really be taught patience, that has to come on its own but I'd love to know about how you approach beta reading.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:02 pm (UTC)*hugs*
just saying hi :)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:05 pm (UTC)It seems like ages since we touched base!
*squeezes you tight*
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:08 pm (UTC)I fail at beta 101....sigh.
Aren't you supposed to be cooking right now? ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:13 pm (UTC)I know! I need to email you
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:21 pm (UTC)I usually ask my betas to mark their changes using the "track changes" feature of Microsoft Word. Then, when I get the betas back, I can clearly see all the red marks.
I make a duplicate copy of my original, unbetaed file. Then I start with the least detailed beta and move to the most comprehensive one, making changes to my original document. Tired yet? ;-)
Then, using track changes, I compare my modified document to the copy of the unbetaed document to make sure that all the changes made are ones I actually wanted to make. (Then I send it back to one of my betas for a final proofread, to catch any stray typos.)
It sounds more tedious than it actually is.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:25 pm (UTC)I also don't post immediately after making those changes. I've found if I wait 24 hours (minimum) and then reread it, sometimes I may end up making mroe changes - including adding thigs in or taking things out, etc.
Then I start all over again. I even have one fic that I did a couple of years ago that we literally picked apart sentence by sentence because I wanted it PERFECT.
Hope that helps!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:30 pm (UTC)And if I could teach you how to write a long story, I guess it would mean I actually know how to do those, right? Yeah, that's what I thought. Can't help you, then, sorry *sigh*
Then again, isn't your Boxes series - which I love so.very.much - quite long already?
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:30 pm (UTC)as for patience, I can't help you. I can't write anything over 7 pages.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:35 pm (UTC)And then I tweak madly right up until I post, and then A usually emails me and tells me what egregious thing I missed anyway. =)
As for long stories, I think the layered approach works best for me. Get things down and then go back over it and see what's missing. That's worked for me in other fandoms; I've yet to get something really long done here in the pop world (except for the crackfic co-written with A, which refuses to die, and may actually get posted at some point in time.)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:35 pm (UTC)I do it like that, too, and yeah, it's not foolproof, but it works well most of the time. I don't know - maybe it'd help to run the fic through the betas for one last glance, or something.
I hear you on the long and detailed thing. It's so annoying, to have these little pieces of a world you yourself, at least, find fascinating, and not having the patience or the attention span to build the world properly into a long fic. That's why I'll never be a professional writer.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:35 pm (UTC)It actually doesn't sound that tedious at all. Especially having that unbetaed copy to contrast with. I'm going to use that for sure.
Those suggestions are very helpful.
Thank you.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:38 pm (UTC)Waiting is what I find difficult and what I'm working on changing. When I have a completed story I want to post it now and that's not a good thing at all.
It helped a lot, thank you!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:42 pm (UTC)But you do do long. Well maybe not long long but I know you can write long. I've seen you do it.
I love that you love Boxes, Have I told you that? *g* It ended up around 29,000 words but I really want to go longer than that. I just don't know if I can.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:49 pm (UTC)Good luck!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:51 pm (UTC)I wish you could learn patience. Most of my stories lately have been sticking around 7000/9000 words and it's frustrating. I know I have a long story in my head but I just can't seem to find it.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 06:51 pm (UTC)As for betaing, well. For my Honey story I had about four betas, all of whom were sent my rough copy of the story, and they corrected it as they saw fit. Then I open up my original one, go through each beta painstakingly (so I went through the story 4 times in total), tweaking as the betas saw fit. At each and every correction I stand back and consider it grammatically and contextually. If it didn't feel right to me I just left it as is and continued. Then after I was done tweaking I sent it to one more beta, to make sure the story made sense after everything. Extremely tedious if you've got a 20,000 over word story, I can tell you.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 07:07 pm (UTC)I like the idea of looking at all the betas together, doing that would eliminate changing things then changing them again with each different beta. It seems so obvious when it's pointed out like this.
I like the idea of the layered approach too. I think it's the going back part that I'm failing at right now.
Thank you so much for the suggestions. They're really helping.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 07:41 pm (UTC)I could never be a professional writer either. I hear you about not having patience. It sucks but it's something I'm trying to overcome because I really do want to write long.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 08:18 pm (UTC)For the one I'm working on now, this is the first time I've had a RL friend who can beta. I print the word doc, bring it to her, and she writes all over it. We sat in her office with the door shut to discuss it - like a real meeting.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-10 10:18 pm (UTC)Seems to work well!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-11 02:16 am (UTC)If I get comments via e-mail, then I reply to the mail and keep the reply open as I go through it, deleting the betas comments if I either put them it or decide not to use them, or commenting in the mail if I want to clarify something. If I get a commented-on file rather than an e-mail, then I do the same thing -- save another copy of the beta file and go through it line by line, deleting the copy of the beta file as I make each of the changes in the master file. However, probably because I only deal in .txt files, I tend to get e-mail rather than annotated files.
Actually, thinking about it, I'm horrible to beta for, because I can't stop fiddling and editing, and sending changed bits to my poor betas.
So does anyone want to teach me how to work on a really long story and stop being so impatient?
Heh. If I'd found a good way of teaching patience, I'd be running seminars and making myself a rich woman :-)
I guess one thing is to try to break the link between 'finishing' and posting. When I finish a story, in the sense of having the whole plot there, and all the scenes, and the story reading from beginning to end with no missing bits, then it feels more like reaching the half-way point then completing anything. Sure, I now know the story *can* be done, but I usually expect to spend as much, or even more, time rewriting and editing then I did writing in the first place. (Which had a lot to do with how I write, and I know some people do much more pre-planning and much less rewriting.)
I rarely post stuff as soon as I finish it. Sometimes I'll post a very short snippet (max of 1000 words, say) pretty soon after it's done. Usually I sit on even a short one for at least a few days, rereading and editing occasionally. Sometimes it's much longer before I decide that something it ready to go out. This is one reason I rarely take part in challenges, and when I do I always try and get the story done at least a month before the deadline, so I have enough time for it to mature.
With no deadline, I can end up waiting a while. Get Your Money's Worth hung around for months until
So, anyway, I suppose the moral of all that is: things aren't really complete until you're 100% happy with them and know they're as good as you can get them. Anything else which looks like 'complete' is an optical illusion.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-11 05:28 am (UTC)You know I love that story SO much, Terri. I'm pretty sure it's my favorite of yours. I'd LOVE to see more of the prequel & sequel!
And, um, sorry I can't really help with the writing thing. Which you know is driving me absolutely batshit!crazy, 'cuz I LOVE to help people write, but I'm afraid I'm idea guy. Or spelling guy, or Americanization guy, or grammar guy, but the actual beta-process? I just, um, re-read and tweak. A Lot "". And I have =NO= clue what to tell you about long stories, 'cuz... ..it's just how I think. How my stories write themselves. They're ALWAYS longer than I originally thought they'd be, and you know I could probably make them even longer if I chose/wanted to. But I'm not really sure HOW that happens, or if I could put it into words for you even if I was.
But I do wish you ALL the Good Luck in the world in your efforts! I *K*N*O*W* you can do it, that you've got a great, long story in you, and am here for you all the way until you're satisfied with it!!!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-11 06:59 am (UTC)You're also great when you help me with beta reading, so don't worry about that, and I get what you mean about the long story stuff. In that you can't say 'how' you do it. I'm just frustrated that all my stuff seems to be around the 8000 word mark lately. Though I suspect that could be because I'm doing challenges that have a limited time. I don't know.
I'll keep trying for that long story, it'll come out one day ;)
Thanks, honey. You're the best!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-11 07:29 am (UTC)Actually, thinking about it, I'm horrible to beta for, because I can't stop fiddling and editing, and sending changed bits to my poor betas.
Okay, a question. When you're wearing your beta hat are you okay with getting a file over and over? Because I always worry that I'm being annoying and taking up too much time. I also know if A saw this ( with her being my main beta and all she'd tell me not to be silly, but I can't help worrying )
Heh. If I'd found a good way of teaching patience, I'd be running seminars and making myself a rich woman :-)
Yeah, I figured that *g* But hey, if you ever find out I'll be first in line for a place at that seminar.
I guess one thing is to try to break the link between 'finishing' and posting.
And right there you have my problem. I do very little planning when I write, I just do it and see where it goes. Then when the story is done I'll get it beta read, change things then post. Which is the wrong thing to do I know.
I'm honestly in awe that you can keep stories on your HD so long. Everything you say makes a huge amount of sense though and I really hope I can take some of that on board.
Thanks so much for answering.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-11 07:31 am (UTC)Thanks for answering :)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-11 08:28 am (UTC)Especially sending a story out one person at a time. That makes so much sense and I can't believe I didn't think of it before.
Discussing stories with a RL friend sounds so cool. The closest I got to doing that was doing a beta over AIM which was a really good thing to do.
Again, thanks for answering.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-11 08:57 am (UTC)I get what you mean about rushing for challenges though. All my last stories have been challenges which is part of the reason I'm stuck on the 8,000 word short story range. I really need to change that and write something without a deadline.
Beta reading is tedious I agree. At least the nit picking details are. I quite like when you add things and change scenes around.
Thanks so much for answering!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-11 10:18 am (UTC)I think missing a few things is just the way it is. Even when you read through a file twenty times you can still find a couple typos somewhere in there.
Also, do you ever read something and know it could be more?
All the time with my stories. That's the reason I rarely reread my own stuff, because I get angry and embarrassed ;-).
why not my 2 cents?
Date: 2005-06-11 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-11 02:20 pm (UTC)Yep. But then, I love betaing, and usually I'm willing to keep rereading long after the author is willing to keep rewriting. :-)
Something that...not annoys me, but frustrates me, is people who run right up to the deadline with challenge stories. In the last few days before DWNOGA2004 I did a lot of betaing. And the *night* before, I was up until four in the morning betaing for four or five different people, some of whom were still writing the story for the first time. In a way, it was great fun, and the adrenaline from poinging between stories, trying to pinpoint what could be done in the remaining time, was a rush. However, as a beta, it was also incredibly frustrating because the stories could be so much better with more time spent on them.
(Of course, lots of people have very good reasons why they get pushed up to the deadline on challenges, and I completely understand RL taking priority. That doesn't change the outcome from a writing pov, though.)
I do very little planning when I write, I just do it and see where it goes.
That's exactly how I write too :-)
Maybe you could make a rule and try and stick to it, like leaving the story for at least a fortnight after you've decided that it's completely and finally finished, then rereading it and only posting it if there's absolutely nothing you think can be done better in it. (That's what I do on a more extended timeframe -- I don't post until I can reread the story and not find anything I want to do differently or don't quite like.)
Also, there's nothing actually stopping you going back to Boxes and rewriting it. I change stuff all the time -- a couple of months ago I rewrote a scene in The Wedding Cake Theory.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-11 09:52 pm (UTC)I always used to work with the original 'master' file, copying the corrections over from whatever I got back - and if I get fb in emails or comments that's still how I work.
Working with the TP ladies, I got introduced to Word's Track Changes feature, and when you're working with one person [or one person at a time] I find that excellent - I'll take the edited file and work through accepting / rejecting / tweaking / adding, which means I won't miss things that they've noticed, and I still have the original [or version 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 in sopme cases] file in case, as someone else mentioned, thigs go totaly pear shaped and you want to go back to basics.]
The only thing that I can't handle, and I don't know if it's a dyslexia thing or a control freak thing, or actually totaly reasonable, is people who edit by making changed but not telling you what they are. And yes, if you spotted me typing 'we;re' changing it to 'we're' is obviously correct and you don;t need my 'permission', but damnit I want to *know*, and I had someone do that to me when I had the story with two people, and I swear my brain just shut down in protest.
Multiple files over and over - bring it on! As many revisions as it takes, you know? Maybe flag up which sections you've worked on so the editor knows where to focus, but I have no problem reading and editing the same story ten times over. I'm not the best proof reader in the world by a long shot, but I do actually like the editing / beta *process*, so I'm easy.
There's also the fact that people *will* miss typos. The odd one makes it into printed books that have been signed off by the original editor, the author, and at least two professional proof readers. [and the Tp stuff goes from the author to the editor to a final proof before press]
I like your habit of posting a final draft in a locked post after we've been through the word file, as changing the layout often helps me read something with clearer eyes and catch more little things - I do that with my things, and my TP editing, in fact, in locked posts, or switching fonts etc.
There's really nothing stopping you from re-working the current incarnation of Boxes as you add to it, you know. Hell, I'm still working on Pumas, and I'm almost certainly going to tweak the existing scenes a little as I go.
Nice supportive 'preview' readers are, I think, the key to breaking the write / post loop, if you want to do that. I never feel like I've done with soemthing until someone's read it, which is how come you and A keep getting the 'day files' on things that I'm not posting as I go ;) - C and L generally get those for the originals, and I had 5 or 6 volunteers to cheerlead the Bears story, which was vital for me. I aspire to one day be the totaly self supporting kind of author who can do all that in their own head and not need an external mirror, but untill I discover that really I'm pissing them off, I'm very happy to have a small 'writers cirlce' who get to see the rough drafts and deleted scenes and aborted dead ends as well as the finished stuff.
I'm still going back and making small changes to stories I posted two years back, if something prompts me to go back and re-read and I see them, and I love people who point them out to me so I *can* fix them. Crit makes me happy ;)
*snuggles*
*snuggles some more*
Once again, I'm all about process, aren't I?
no subject
Date: 2005-06-11 10:15 pm (UTC)[and also a cue to go back to the re-reading ahead of the re-writing and more-writing ;p]
no subject
Date: 2005-06-11 10:28 pm (UTC)Heh. While I was typing the comment, I was thinking 'I hope I don't upset anyone with this'. But -- I know that you know that fantastic as it is, the puma story would've been even better with more time. And will be better, in its glorious extended form!
[and also a cue to go back to the re-reading ahead of the re-writing and more-writing ;p]
{poke, poke} Go! :-)
I was pasting all the bits I have together into a single file this morning, sighing wistfully. I eagerly await more bits to paste in!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-12 09:41 am (UTC)I really like track changes and am going to try what you said next time, that is changing things on that file but have the master file saved somewhere safe just in case.
I'm relieved that you like the beta process. The problem I have is I always think I'm taking too much time, especially yours as you're always my primary beta reader. I know how busy you are so sending file after file seems inconsiderate. Which I know you'd say if you were too busy but I can't help feeling that way, like you should be doing something fun and not checking over yet another version of my story.
Posting in a locked post helps me a lot as like you I catch more things that way, maybe because I've moved from being the writer to a reader, and in doing that get fresh eyes that catch more.
Yeah, I know I could work on it I just don't know what to add. Which sounds silly after what I said in the post but I just got the feeling it could be more you know?
Which probably ties in with all the thoughts about my writing I've had lately, about POV and tense and stuff like that. I'm not putting myself down, honest, but I just want to get better.
You've hit the nail on the head about preview readers. I wish I could be self supporting too but I can't. I need that interaction, which is partially a confidence thing, someone to say I'm not on crack with what I'm writing. I really do want to break the write/post habit because I know it's a bad thing. I also want to get that long story out of my head. Which has no plot or anything but I know it's there *g*
Crit makes me happy too, I know getting it from some awesome people has helped me improve a lot. And you know I'm always pleased to read anything you throw my way. It's a pleasure to do so.
*smooches you*
Thank you for your thoughtful answers.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-12 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-16 05:51 pm (UTC)I like the way you change things on the beta file and I'm going to try that next time.
I hate when you find those damn typos. I'm sure they hide all the time.
Your stuff is lovely and you shouldn't be embarrassed. Maybe it could be more but it doesn't mean what you have isn't good to read. I know I always enjoy your writing. *cough/puppets/cough*
no subject
Date: 2005-06-16 08:50 pm (UTC)It's easier that way for me and I still can check with my original file when I'm confused about something.
Typos happen all the time, most of the time you don't register they are there. The eye sees the word, sees the right length, the right letters, and the brain says, "hey, everything fits, it must be correct" or something like that ;-).
Thanks! I just shouldn't compare my writing with other people's writing. And yeah, puppet!Chris will get finished after my exam! Whee.
Re: why not my 2 cents?
Date: 2005-06-20 01:31 pm (UTC)Thanks for your beta thoughts too. I've got into a habit of staying within one POV which I really should break as it tends to be limiting. I really need to try and do a multiple POV story soon.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-20 01:36 pm (UTC)That's a great rule. I'm sitting on the story I wrote for Lambs day now. I had to post it there obviously but it's not at my site and I didn't announce it on Shiny and New, mainly because I still don't like it that much.
Taking you at your word you really do like beta reading would you take a look? There's no time limit at all, changing things is for my own satisfaction really at this point. Man, I always feel like a cheeky cow asking.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-20 05:00 pm (UTC)Heh. It was a fun night.
Taking you at your word you really do like beta reading would you take a look?
Sure! I'm always happy to look at things for you (although I'd rather beta stories with happy endings, just because I like happy endings, :-) and likewise I'm not so keen on AUs).
no subject
Date: 2005-06-20 05:10 pm (UTC)Wow. I'd never do that. Mostly, I guess, because I assume that people won't be using the file I send back as the story file and they'll be copying the changes into another file, so if I don't make a note they won't know to do it. But, also, I'd feel like I was being too pushy, even when it's something very technical. Or at the least, I'd ask before I did anything like that.
So, I think you're being pretty reasonable.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-20 05:18 pm (UTC)I think I'm scared at your idea of fun ;)
As for the story it's not an AU so don't worry and it did have a happy ending.
I'll e mail you, thank you.